|
Claremont School Dist. v. Governor, 138 N.H. 183
(1993)(Claremont I) (state has a constitutional obligation to
provide and pay for an adequate education for all New Hampshire children).
Claremont School Dist. v. Governor, 142 N.H. 462
(1997)(Claremont II) (adequate education is a fundamental right,
then-current system of funding education unconstitutional, state's
definition of an adequate education unconstitutional).
Claremont School Dist. v. Governor, 142 N.H. 737
(1998)(Claremont III) (motion to vacate the Claremont II decision
because of Justice Batchelder's age).
Claremont School Dist. v. Governor, 143 N.H. 154
(1998)(Claremont IV)
(court denies state's request for a two year extension
to comply with Claremont II's order to develop a constitutional method of
funding education).
Opinion of the Justices, 142 N.H. 892 (1998)
(tax abatement provisions of Governor Shaheen's ABC plan unconstitutional)
Opinion of the Justices, 143 N.H. 429 (1999)
(tax plan referendum unconstitutional)
Claremont School Dist. v. Governor, 144 N.H. 210
(1999)(Claremont V) (phase-in
of statewide property tax unconstitutional)
Claremont School Dist. v. Governor, 144 N.H. 590
(1999) (Claremont VI)
(award of attorney's fees)
Opinion of the Justices, 145 N.H. 474 (2000)
(Fred King plan to fund part of educational adequacy
unconstitutional)
Claremont School Dist. v. Governor, 147 N.H. 499
(2002) (Claremont VII)
(state's constitutional obligation includes standards
of accountability and current state standards unconstitutional)
|